Archive

Archive for the ‘selling content online’ Category

My Deepest, Darkest Secrets Revealed via Audio

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr

Selling Free Content Izzy and Tim from FoolishAdventure.com were kind enough to have me on their show this week.

In the podcast, I tell some stories about how I got into the paid content business plus some of the things I’ve learned along the way that I haven’t talked about before.

You can check it out here.

Izzy and Tim ask some great questions – a great example of how to interview well, actually. So if you don’t listen for my killer business tips, listen just to pick up a few interview tricks.

membership pricing, selling content online, starting a membership site

The Free Final Cut Pro X Tutorials I Just Paid For

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr

Selling Free Content You may have heard all the hubub about Apple’s new version of Final Cut Pro X over the last few weeks. Some pro video editors see it as a step backwards. But for “prosumers” like Emile and I, it’s a terrific next step from iMovie that we’ve purchased and will begin using to do more video.

What really convinced me to spend the $299 for the downloadable program were a set of free Final Cut Pro X tutorials from IzzyVideo.com. Emile and I have known and followed Izzy over the past couple of years, but it was a coincidence that we landed on his site for the tutorials after I did a search for lessons on how to use the product.

Izzy is a helluva smart online entrepreneur and one of the things he’s doing with these FCP X lessons is brilliant and I wanted to call your attention to the business model. He’s offering the lessons free of charge as streaming videos on his website. If you want to download the lessons to your computer and also get the media files he uses to edit with during the lessons so you can follow along, he is charging a very reasonable $49 (and currently discounted to an even more reasonable $37).

It’s a terrific example of how content creators can serve all audiences and still make money selling their free tutorials, lessons and content. For those content creators who are hesitant to throw all of their content behind a pay wall, it’s also an excellent hybrid business model that will still allow you to attract traffic and followers while offering a premium product.

Offering the download of a streaming product along with a thing or two not available with the stream can work for any content creator on any topic or subject matter.

We’ll have to do an interview with Izzy in a few months to see how it all worked out. In the meantime, I just became a customer.

Izzy also does a podcast and blog with Tim Conley about online business tactics and selling online content that I highly recommend called FoolishAdventure.com. Be sure to subscribe to the RSS feed and check out some of the back episodes – pure gold.

creating content, online entrepreneurs, selling content online , ,

How To Sell $500,000 Worth of Content Each Year

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr

Selling Yourself Selling Content The Planet Money radio show and podcast, a favorite NPR podcast second only to This American Life, recently did a story on how the Internet had changed the music industry forever.

It’s not a new theme, of course, but one part of the show caught my attention. They profiled independent musician Jonathan Coulton and talked about how he sells nearly $500,000 worth of his music every year on his own website and without a record contract.

Many of the things he talks about work just as well with other types of content as they do with music. Particularly the part when Jonathan talks about how his relationship with his followers and fans is the fuel for his sales. Without it, he acknowledges he wouldn’t be nearly as successful.

As an entrepreneur, I always start a website with the exit in mind – how will I be able to sell this to someone else down the road? But the problem then becomes trying to build a site where we as the content producers aren’t front and center and built around our personalities. Trying to do so will usually result in failure because even the best content available won’t sell if your audience doesn’t feel some sort of connection with you personally.

For now, we’ve decided to be front and center in order to have success and make money. We’ll just have to figure out how we extricate ourselves from the site when it’s time to sell. There’s no easy answer, but since the sales must come first, it’s the only choice we see for now.

Let us know if you have new ideas about this.

For now, here is the audio clip of the segment and a transcript below.

1) Listen to the audio here (click on the triangle play button):

 

2) Download the mp3 file here

3) Read the transcript:

All right. So the story that I guess the record labels want us all to believe is that we’re all in trouble because it’s impossible to sell music for a fair price these days because it’s so easy to steal it, right? And the idea is that Napster made this all possible and now we’re all used to it, there’s no turning back.

And the argument is –

And the argument from the industry’s point of view is that this makes it incredibly hard to sell records when anybody who has a broadband connection can basically just go in the internet and get them for free.

The idea being that we have devalued music.

I see. And what do you guys think about that argument?

I think it’s probably fairly accurate. I mean I’m not sure that the price pre-Napster was entirely fair and the way that the money broke down certainly didn’t always benefit the artist.

But we’re all used to getting it for free and or for 99 cents a song or maybe, you know, 49. And I think that that ultimately does hurt the artist.

All right. So, the rest of this podcast is a counter argument to that sentiment. The man I’m going to introduce you to is basically a one-man refutation of that argument and let’s meet him now. Most people listening probably have not heard of this man. His songs never get played on the radio. He doesn’t have a contract with any music label and yet he makes a lot of money doing music, a lot of money.

This is a spreadsheet of my income over the last four years, so 2007 through 2010.

And I’m looking at the total net, are you prepared to reveal those figures?

You know, it’s — I don’t know. It’s always — it’s embarrassing to talk about that.

Ladies and gentlemen, Franny, Jacob meet Jonathan Coulton. He is a singer/songwriter in Brooklyn and I, unlike him, am not embarrassed to say what he made in 2010. He actually authorized me to tell everybody. He brought in almost half a million dollars. And since his overhead costs are very low, most of that money goes straight to him.

Which is crazy. It’s just insane.

Did you ever imagine yourself making this much money off of your music?

Of course not.

This is absurd. It’s an absurd situation. Look at me, this ridiculous office here in the parlor of this Brooklyn brownstone. This is the business that I’m doing here, it doesn’t seem right.

Read more…

creating content, selling content online

Sell Your Content As “Pay-Per-View”

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr

UStream Pay-Per-View The tools we can all use to monetize original audio and video content are getting better and better. Today UStream.com opened up the application process for their pay-per-view platform.

I’m not sure what their cut will be, but it’s just one more way independent content creators like us will be able to make money creating valuable information products.

The application form can be found here.

There are several ways I can see using this:

1) You have a particularly high-profile guest that you think will convert to dollars well
2) Allow prospective members to get a taste of your content without committing to a membership yet (but still charge them for something)
3) Just one more revenue stream you can use to make money in addition to traditional sponsorship and membership revenue

Now if Apple will just open up their e-commerce platform in iTunes to allow podcasters to charge for individual shows or create paid memberships, we would really be on to something!

selling content online ,

The Tough (But Necessary) Shift Has Begun

Share:
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Google Bookmarks
  • FriendFeed
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • LinkedIn
  • MySpace
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr

from ad-supported to paid content The New York Times has an interesting piece online about how Condé Nast is beginning the transition from ad-supported content to paid content – complete with the “I’ll never pay for anything…they are doomed to fail…” whining of the typical freebie hounds.

Yet it is a transition that must happen if traditional media companies are to survive. Advertising just isn’t working as it used to and it is much harder these days to spend a dollar on ads and make two. I can attest to it first hand from our recent ad spends.

There is no question that Condé Nast and magazines in general are in for a tough time. The reason can be summed up in just a few sentences from the article:

The transition could be made all the more difficult because consumers have grown accustomed to paying so little for Condé Nast’s magazines. “They’ve been one of the biggest offenders for undercharging for their products,” Mr. Janson added. “But having said that, I think there is a certain type of content that people will be willing to pay for.” Mr. Townsend expressed confidence that the consumer would come around, noting, “They pay $180 a month for a cable bill.” The company’s goal is eventually to reach parity in profits from advertising and consumers, he said.

Consumers pay $180 a month for cable because they never got used to paying nearly nothing for it because it was subsidized by advertising. Cable companies charged for their content (or more appropriately, to deliver that content) from the beginning and there was never an expectation that it would be nearly free.

I don’t believe the new strategy is doomed to failure, as Jeff Jarvis seems to. But I do know just from our experiences on a much, much smaller scale that going from free (or nearly free) to a paid model can drain the soul.

As long as traditional media companies keep in mind that the people who will never pay are the most vocal and simply forge on, it will happen. Traditional media companies can fight through the tough fight that is coming and come out on the other end stronger and more powerful.

The article is about as strong an argument as I have seen to charge immediately for content, especially online and especially for smaller players.

ConsumerReports.org starting charging for their content from day one because they don’t accept advertising for their magazine or website in order to stay unbiased. Turns out they were right along.

Creating content for sale is the right way to go for 99% of websites out there. Unfortunately the 98% of them that try Google AdSense first haven’t figured it out yet.

Or maybe I should say fortunately for us. The more people that realize people will pay for content, the more competition we will have. But I also believe that the more niche and specific information you can deliver, the more sales you will make.

creating content, selling content online